
ECO WEB DESIGN
ECO-DESIGN IS BASED ON A METHODOLOGY AND A SET OF GOOD PRACTICES TO REDUCE THE IMPACT OF A WEBSITE ON ITS ENVIRONMENT.
EVALUATION METHOD
Like any digital production, this website has an environmental impact which we present to you on this page using standardized indicators.
We use the repository EcoIndex proposed by the collective GreenIT.fr, to evaluate the environmental performance of this website. This is quantified using two types of indicators:
- Level of eco-design of the website: This indicator evaluates the implementation of good practices to reduce the impact of a web page. The level achieved is represented by a relative evaluation from A to G (A is the best grade) associated with an absolute score from 0 to 100 (100 is the best grade).
- Water consumption and GHG emissions linked to page loading: This metric quantifies the freshwater consumption (cls) and GHG emissions (gCO2e) associated with loading a web page.
For summary purposes, four types of data are represented:
- Eco-design level for the 5 most visited pages of the website.
- Level of eco-design for 5 typical user journeys of the website.
- Water consumption (expressed in liters) and GHG emissions (kg CO2e) linked to the loading of a web page for 1 user, and reported for 1,000 users.
- Water consumption (expressed in liters) and GHG emissions (kilos CO2e) linked to the execution of a route for 1 user, and reported for 1,000 users.
The analysis indicated below is subject to change: the quantification of environmental impacts presented is a photograph taken at a given time.
ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION OF THIS SITE
-
- Ecoindex rating: 79
- Average water consumption reported for 1,000 users: 216 litres, soit 24 packs d’eau minérale. *
- Average Greenhouse Gas (GHG) emissions reported for 1,000 users: 1.42 kilos CO2e, or a 7 km journey in a thermal energy car. *
*Average environmental impact of the 5 most-visited pages on this website.
EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF THE 5 MOST VISITED PAGES OF THE SIT
HOME PAGE
- Water consumption reported per 1,000 users : 225 liters , or 25 packs of mineral water.
- GHG emissions reported per 1,000 users : 1.5 kilos CO2e , i.e. a 7 km journey by thermal energy car.
Expertise and strategy
- Water consumption reported per 1,000 users : 210 liters, or 25 packs of mineral water.
- GHG emissions reported per 1,000 users : 1.4 kilos CO2e, i.e. a 7 km journey by thermal energy car.
Acquisition and Visibility
- Water consumption reported per 1,000 users : 220 liters, or 25 packs of mineral water.
- GHG emissions reported per 1,000 users : 1.44 kilos CO2e, i.e. a 7 km journey by thermal energy car.
Search Engine Optimization and AI
- Water consumption reported per 1,000 users : 210 liters, or 25 packs of mineral water.
- GHG emissions reported per 1,000 users : 1.4 kilos CO2e, i.e. a 7 km journey by thermal energy car.
Offer marketing & positioning
- Water consumption reported per 1,000 users : 207 liters, or 25 packs of mineral water.
- GHG emissions reported per 1,000 users : 1.38 kilos CO2e, i.e. a 7 km journey by thermal energy car.